Author summary
53% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Mullin results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,150 hits . Analysis detected 9,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,816 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,751 of 9,377 authors). This Emily Mullin is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Emily Mullin
Author details
Total words: 13,816
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst