Author summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Taylor results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 972 hits . Analysis detected 7,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,884 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,979 of 9,487 authors). This Kate Taylor is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Kate Taylor
Author details
Total words: 9,884
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst