Publication summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KRCU Public Radio results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 997 hits. Analysis detected 2,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (206 of 584 publications). This KRCU Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
KRCU Public Radio
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 4,948
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos