Author summary
84% 5 analyzed articles/videos 747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Cirruzzo results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 936 hits . Analysis detected 4,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,560 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,184 of 9,471 authors). This Chelsea Cirruzzo is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Chelsea Cirruzzo
Author details
Total words: 5,560
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst