Author summary
58%1 analyzed article/video1,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Shutt results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 937 hits. Analysis detected 4,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (4,978 of 9,161 authors). This Jennifer Shutt is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Jennifer Shutt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
46%Jennifer Shutt (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,020
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos