Topic summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial-Intelligence results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 3,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,802 of 21,637 topics). This Artificial-Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Artificial-Intelligence
Topic details
Total words: 6,560
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst