Author summary
63%9 analyzed articles/videos2,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jess Weatherbed results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,260 hits. Analysis detected 10,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,668 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,387 of 8,524 authors). This Jess Weatherbed is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Jess Weatherbed
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Jess Weatherbed (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,668
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate