Author summary
46% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chance Miller results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 2,848 hits . Analysis detected 16,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,804 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (6,986 of 8,803 authors). This Chance Miller is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Chance Miller
Author details
Total words: 28,804
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score15 analyzed articles28.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst