9to5Mac75%

macOS 27 brings three key upgrades to iPhone Mirroring 39%

By Chance Miller52%

7/31/2026, 4:37:47 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 344 faulty-reasoning hits from 315 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of 39% (18,818 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the article peer group.

I use iPhone Mirroring every day to quickly access my iPhone directly from my Mac, and it’s getting even better this year. iOS 27 and macOS 27 Golden Gate public betas were released this month, bringing three key updates to iPhone Mirroring. 
Here’s everything new. 
macOS 27: What’s new for iPhone Mirroring 
The biggest change for iPhone Mirroring in macOS 27 is the ability to resize the iPhone Mirroring window. 
As my colleague Marcus reported last week, you can now adjust the size of the iPhone Mirroring window with any iOS 27-compatible apps. 
Right now, that means it only works for Apple’s native iPhone apps. 
However, once developers start rolling out iOS 27 updates later this year, support for resizing will expand rapidly. 
iPhone Mirroring in macOS 27 and iOS 27 also has several other updates: 
Control Center access 
DRM video support 
Previously, iPhone Mirroring did not support accessing Control Center at all. 
In macOS 27, you can access it with the CMD+4 keyboard shortcut or with the “View” menu in your Mac’s menu bar. 
DRM video support means you can watch protected videos using iPhone Mirroring on your Mac. 
Previously, all DRM-protected videos would simply show a black screen when iPhone Mirroring was enabled. 
macOS 27 also has a new app icon for iPhone Mirroring, just like it does for many other stock Apple apps. 
How often do you use iPhone Mirroring on your Mac? 
Are you excited for these changes in iOS 27 and macOS 27? 
Have you tried them out in the public betas? 
Let us know down in the comments. 
Chance’s favorites: 
AirPods Pro 3: $199 (Reg. 
$249) 
Bring wireless CarPlay to any car 
“Apple: The First 50 Years” by David Pogue 
Logitech MX Master 4 
Belkin 3-in-1 MagSafe Charger 
Beats Woven USB-C Charging Cables 
Follow Chance: Threads, Bluesky, Instagram, and Mastodon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 1.9%9to5Mac: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.8%9to5Mac: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Chance Miller: 2.0%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 2.8%9to5Mac: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Chance Miller: 3.0%9to5Mac: 4.2%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 1.2%9to5Mac: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Chance Miller: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.0%Chance Miller: 3.1%9to5Mac: 3.2%Optimism Bias19.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 1.3%9to5Mac: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Chance Miller: 1.5%9to5Mac: 3.6%Negativity Bias4.8%This article: 13.3%Chance Miller: 2.2%9to5Mac: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Chance Miller: 2.0%9to5Mac: 2.7%Halo Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 1.1%9to5Mac: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.3%Chance Miller: 1.6%9to5Mac: 2.8%Appeal to Authority7.3%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.3%9to5Mac: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 5.7%Chance Miller: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.5%Slippery Slope5.7%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 4.0%9to5Mac: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%Chance Miller: 1.1%9to5Mac: 1.6%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.8%Chance Miller: 1.1%9to5Mac: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.8%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 2.7%9to5Mac: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 1.1%9to5Mac: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 1.1%9to5Mac: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.6%Chance Miller: 4.8%9to5Mac: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice7.6%This article: 3.8%Chance Miller: 2.7%9to5Mac: 1.6%Indoctrination3.8%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chance Miller: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Chance Miller: 9.6%9to5Mac: 13.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.1%

315 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.