Author summary
65% 34 analyzed articles/videos 2,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cascade PBS Staff results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 2,026 hits . Analysis detected 8,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,350 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,246 of 8,616 authors). This Cascade PBS Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Cascade PBS Staff
Author details
Total words: 9,350
Article count: 34
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score34 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst