Topic summary
82% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artemis Program results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 4,020 hits . Analysis detected 23,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,143 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (17,499 of 24,545 topics). This Artemis Program is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Artemis Program
Topic details
Total words: 35,143
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles35.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst