Author summary
11%1 analyzed article/video1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Harwood results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (6,550 of 8,706 authors). This William Harwood is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
William Harwood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
25%William Harwood (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos