Publication summary
73% 330 analyzed articles/videos 183,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CBC results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 52,057 hits . Analysis detected 657,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 922,316 analyzed words across 329 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (333 of 568 publications). This CBC is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 922,316
Article count: 329
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score329 analyzed articles922.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 73% 8/6/2026, 9:00:00 PM
CBC 73% 8/4/2026, 1:43:17 PM
CBC 73% 8/4/2026, 11:48:47 AM
CBC 73% 7/31/2026, 3:00:00 AM
CBC 73% 7/25/2026, 1:00:00 AM
CBC 73% 7/24/2026, 9:48:54 AM
CBC 73% 7/19/2026, 9:48:28 AM
CBC 73% 7/14/2026, 1:49:45 AM
CBC 73% 7/12/2026, 10:36:57 AM