Topic summary
87% 23 analyzed articles/videos 17,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Rights results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 12,278 hits . Analysis detected 96,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,260 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (13,945 of 24,545 topics). This Abortion Rights is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Abortion Rights
Topic details
Total words: 84,260
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score23 analyzed articles84.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst