Author summary
74% 30 analyzed articles/videos 13,963 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Marcus results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 7,894 hits . Analysis detected 62,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,801 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (5,929 of 8,677 authors). This Josh Marcus is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Josh Marcus
Author details
Total words: 70,801
Article count: 30
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score30 analyzed articles70.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst