Author summary
93% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Riga results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 2,413 hits . Analysis detected 13,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,724 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,954 of 8,677 authors). This Kate Riga is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Kate Riga
Author details
Total words: 10,724
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.5% 22.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst