Author summary
99% 17 analyzed articles/videos 10,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Needham results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 23,875 hits . Analysis detected 99,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,716 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,634 of 8,712 authors). This Lisa Needham is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Lisa Needham
Author details
Total words: 46,716
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score17 analyzed articles46.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 51.1% 51.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 16.6% 16.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 15.4% 15.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.5% 27.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 51.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 27.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 15.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst