Speaker summary
44% 201 analyzed articles/videos 7,540.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Central Command results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,176.683 hits . Analysis detected 4,271.926 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,540.333 analyzed words across 201 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 1% (40,865 of 40,975 speakers). This U.S. Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. U.S. Central Command
Speaker details
Total words: 7,540.333
Article count: 201
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score201 analyzed videos7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst