Author summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Goggin results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,052 hits . Analysis detected 6,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,908 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,294 of 8,802 authors). This Ben Goggin is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Ben Goggin
Author details
Total words: 9,908
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst