Author summary
47%8 analyzed articles/videos10,274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rishi Iyengar results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 4,999 hits. Analysis detected 34,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,787 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (8,376 of 9,375 authors). This Rishi Iyengar is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Rishi Iyengar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
11%Rishi Iyengar (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 60,787
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles60.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate