Speaker summary
67% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,831.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tucker Carlson results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , False Dilemma , and Overconfidence Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 748 hits . Analysis detected 4,910.861 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,831.667 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,934 of 45,069 speakers). This Tucker Carlson is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Tucker Carlson
Speaker details
Total words: 1,831.667
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.6% BS Score16 analyzed videos1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 26.8% 26.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 25.0% 25.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst