Author summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Caryl results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,739 hits . Analysis detected 19,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,174 of 9,039 authors). This Christian Caryl is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Christian Caryl
Author details
Total words: 17,028
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst