Speaker summary
63% 30 analyzed articles/videos 3,892.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Miller results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 695.698 hits . Analysis detected 5,095.916 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,892.333 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (42,912 of 43,178 speakers). This Max Miller is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Max Miller
Speaker details
Total words: 3,892.333
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score30 analyzed videos3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst