Author summary
54%2 analyzed articles/videos960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole LaFond results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 1,140 hits. Analysis detected 4,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,173 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (4,937 of 8,572 authors). This Nicole LaFond is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Nicole LaFond
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
43%Nicole LaFond (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,173
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate