Speaker summary
65% 27 analyzed articles/videos 2,328.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Zuckerberg results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 342 hits . Analysis detected 3,566.584 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,328.667 analyzed words across 27 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,804 of 45,350 speakers). This Mark Zuckerberg is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker details
Total words: 2,328.667
Content count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score27 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Straw Man: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst