Author summary
84% 28 analyzed articles/videos 10,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Landymore results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 10,682 hits . Analysis detected 68,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,791 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,316 of 8,708 authors). This Frank Landymore is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Frank Landymore
Author details
Total words: 55,791
Article count: 28
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score28 analyzed articles55.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst