Speaker summary
67% 211 analyzed articles/videos 20,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JD Vance results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,468.895 hits . Analysis detected 24,437.982 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,306 analyzed words across 211 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,770 of 44,907 speakers). This JD Vance is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. JD Vance
Speaker details
Total words: 20,306
Content count: 211
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score211 analyzed videos20.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst