Author summary
94% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Digby Parton results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 5,501 hits . Analysis detected 30,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,404 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,450 of 8,881 authors). This Heather Digby Parton is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Heather Digby Parton
Author details
Total words: 19,404
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.4% 28.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst