Publication summary
99% 409 analyzed articles/videos 171,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox News results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 4,504 hits . Analysis detected 41,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,871 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (184 of 556 publications). This Fox News is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 39,871
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score17 analyzed articles39.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst