Author summary
85% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zsombor Peter results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,655 hits . Analysis detected 11,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,084 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,220 of 9,436 authors). This Zsombor Peter is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Zsombor Peter
Author details
Total words: 10,084
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.4% 16.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst