Speaker summary
66%11 analyzed articles/videos295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heritage Foundation results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,147.589 faulty-reasoning hits from 295 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (36,358 of 45,144 speakers). This Heritage Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Heritage Foundation
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
20%Heritage Foundation (selected)13%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
12.9% BS Score11 analyzed videos295 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate