Author summary
70%3 analyzed articles/videos4,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francis Fukuyama results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,682 hits. Analysis detected 15,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,224 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,131 of 9,102 authors). This Francis Fukuyama is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Francis Fukuyama
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
44%Francis Fukuyama (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,224
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos