Author summary
97% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Ford Cotto results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,477 hits . Analysis detected 13,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 78% (2,121 of 9,487 authors). This Joseph Ford Cotto is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Joseph Ford Cotto
Author details
Total words: 8,720
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.9% 13.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.9% 16.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst