Author summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Haughey results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 749 hits . Analysis detected 4,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,488 of 9,163 authors). This Paul Haughey is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Paul Haughey
Author details
Total words: 2,952
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.4% 25.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.7% 13.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 13.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst