Publication summary
72% 92 analyzed articles/videos 62,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inverse results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 53,978 hits . Analysis detected 277,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 315,927 analyzed words across 92 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (268 of 548 publications). This Inverse is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 315,927
Article count: 92
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score92 analyzed articles315.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst