Author summary
58%5 analyzed articles/videos2,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Rife results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 2,092 hits. Analysis detected 10,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,624 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (4,959 of 8,521 authors). This Katie Rife is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Katie Rife
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
42%Katie Rife (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,624
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate