Author summary
75% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chrishaun Baker results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 9,840 hits . Analysis detected 50,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,766 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,234 of 8,538 authors). This Chrishaun Baker is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Chrishaun Baker
Author details
Total words: 45,766
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score12 analyzed articles45.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.5% 21.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst