Author summary
62%15 analyzed articles/videos12,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyvie Scott results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 10,578 hits. Analysis detected 48,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 59,046 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,863 of 9,471 authors). This Lyvie Scott is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Lyvie Scott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
28%Lyvie Scott (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 59,046
Article count: 15
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score15 analyzed articles59K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.9%17.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate