Author summary
62% 15 analyzed articles/videos 12,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyvie Scott results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 10,578 hits . Analysis detected 48,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 59,046 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,863 of 9,471 authors). This Lyvie Scott is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Lyvie Scott
Author details
Total words: 59,046
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score15 analyzed articles59K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst