Author summary
ā 56% 1 analyzed article/video 887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon O'Brien results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 2,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 64% (3,127 of 8,524 authors). This Jon O'Brien is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Jon O'Brien
Author details
Total words: 3,548
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.7% 25.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst