Author summary
53% 15 analyzed articles/videos 8,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Britt results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 6,584 hits . Analysis detected 29,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,777 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,479 of 9,213 authors). This Ryan Britt is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Ryan Britt
Author details
Total words: 45,777
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score15 analyzed articles45.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst