Keyword summary
95% 14 analyzed articles/videos 8,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White-House results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 6,243 hits . Analysis detected 45,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,886 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (24,512 of 58,509 keywords). This White-House is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. White-House
Keyword details
Total words: 33,886
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst