Author summary
75%4 analyzed articles/videos1,903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nandita Bose results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,173 hits. Analysis detected 6,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,380 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,299 of 9,118 authors). This Nandita Bose is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Nandita Bose
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
86%Nandita Bose (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,380
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.8%20.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 21.8%21.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate