Keyword summary
86% 11 analyzed articles/videos 10,614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midterm Election results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 4,270 hits . Analysis detected 40,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,531 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 32% (35,154 of 51,681 keywords). This Midterm Election is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group. Midterm Election
Keyword details
Total words: 40,531
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles40.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst