Author summary
90% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Ceballos results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 2,226 hits . Analysis detected 18,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,142 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,303 of 8,706 authors). This Ana Ceballos is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Ana Ceballos
Author details
Total words: 15,142
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst