Keyword summary
94% 96 analyzed articles/videos 70,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marco Rubio results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 34,844 hits . Analysis detected 310,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 304,336 analyzed words across 96 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 32% (35,542 of 52,177 keywords). This Marco Rubio is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Marco Rubio
Keyword details
Total words: 304,336
Article count: 96
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score96 analyzed articles304.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst