Author summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Torres results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 2,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,633 of 8,706 authors). This Andrea Torres is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Andrea Torres
Author details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst