Author summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brett Knese results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (552 of 8,712 authors). This Brett Knese is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Brett Knese
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠94%Brett Knese (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 460
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles460 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.4%7.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.5%16.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos