Publication summary
ā 80% 14 analyzed articles/videos 20,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Grayzone results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 13,394 hits . Analysis detected 81,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 81,139 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ā 62% (220 of 574 publications). This The Grayzone is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 81,139
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score14 analyzed articles81.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 12.0% 12.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Publication 12.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst