Author summary
62% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Grayzone results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,433 hits . Analysis detected 12,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,484 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (5,088 of 9,471 authors). This The Grayzone is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. The Grayzone
Author details
Total words: 13,484
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst