Author summary
89% 22 analyzed articles/videos 11,557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharon Zhang results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 7,783 hits . Analysis detected 58,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,859 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,370 of 9,471 authors). This Sharon Zhang is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Sharon Zhang
Author details
Total words: 47,859
Article count: 22
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score22 analyzed articles47.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst